National Security Strategy Comparison

Mid-Term Essay †Compare/Contrast European Security Strategy (ESS) with US National Security Strategy (NSS) By James E. McDonald Regional/Cultural Studies Lesson 03 24 Mar 2013 Instructor: Col (ret) Frank Belote Air Command and Staff College Distance Learning Maxwell AFB, AL The Security Strategy of the United States has checked likenesses and contrasts to the Security Strategy of Europe. This can be adequately followed to the similitudes and contrasts between the two societies themselves, especially in the social variables of religion, modernization, ethnicity/patriotism, and geography.The US and Europe have various reactions to the modernization of fighting from conventional (ships, armed forces, tanks, airplane) to â€Å"asymmetrical† (psychological warfare, digital fighting), to a great extent from contrasts in geology: With the eminent special cases of Pearl Harbor and the World Trade Center, our foe danger has been a great many miles away, while Europe has seen two b leeding â€Å"world wars† and demonstrations of dread submitted directly on home soil.However, for the motivations behind this paper, I will concentrate on religion and ethnicity/patriotism, and how these two components influence vital culture. Culture is significant. It characterizes what’s imperative to a gathering, or country. It develops in expressed tenet, laws, procedure. It characterizes what our identity is. There are regular perspectives, interests, needs, and verbiage in both Security Strategic reports. Significant forces find a sense of contentment. The world economy has developed; globalism is progressively significant. We should lessen reliance on remote energy.We have a guarantee to union with one another (US and Europe) through NATO (Obama, 2010, 1-9) (European Security Strategy, 2003, 2-14). NATO has made a solid tie between the US and Europe since it was made to contain the Soviets, coordinating Europe and the United States strategically and militarily (Friedman, 2011, 1). Truth be told, â€Å"For any sort of military arranging and tasks as to Russia, the Europeans will like to act through NATO instead of the EU. † (Valesek, 2008, 1)In complexity to the above shared traits, the United States report, while recognizing that â€Å"no one nationâ€no matter how powerfulâ€can address worldwide difficulties alone†, more than once shows looks at â€Å"Nationalist† hints with proclamations, for example, â€Å"Our nation has the characteristics that have bolstered our authority for decadesâ€sturdy collusions, an unequaled military, the world’s biggest economy, a solid and advancing popular government, and a unique populace. † (Obama, 2010, 1-9). The European archive, then again, straightforwardly and over and over calls for â€Å"Unification† and â€Å"Cooperation† (European Security Strategy, 2003, 1-8).The United States can draw from European strict history and ethnic source, whic h gives it some social likenesses. Simultaneously, the introduction of our country was a lot more later, thus significantly not quite the same as the start of European history, that it’s no big surprise there are major contrasts in culture. Indeed, even before the Declaration of Independence (â€Å"God† and â€Å"truth† referenced) or the US Constitution were drafted (â€Å"freedom of religion†), early America was established in Christianity. The primary Pilgrims fled strict abuse in Europe.Christian tenet has been cited in talks given by American pioneers from the earliest starting point (Governor John Walthrop, Massachusetts Governor, 1630), to later/present-day Presidents (Reagan, GW Bush, Obama), The United States has been alluded to as something â€Å"different†, a brilliant illustration all the world to see and copy, a â€Å"city on a hill†. (Walthrop, 1630, 1). America, from its beginnings to today, while inviting decent variety, keep s on being a predominately Christian culture, taking into account strict suggestions in national records (generally obvious through reference to â€Å"values†, and â€Å"truth†).Europe then again, in its test to bind together the 27 nations that structure the European Union (Rosenberg, 2011, 1), must proceed with caution so as not to estrange or outrage any segment of the contemporary mix of Christian, Muslim, and â€Å"Secular† societies (Rubenstein, 2011, 1). Both the US and Europe are ethnically and racially various. Many wonder about the capacity to hold heading and center despite such assorted variety. Early America shaped migrants into a â€Å"melting pot†, blending chronicled roots into a soup that turned out to be particularly â€Å"American†.Nowadays, the inclination is to clutch ethnic contrasts and depict the outcome as a â€Å"mosaic† or â€Å"salad bowl† †separate pieces that, when seen all in all, make a bigger pict ure (Branigin, 1998). Regardless of this ongoing movement to hold ethnic uniqueness, America appears to effectively classify this into its frontiersman â€Å"rugged individualist† mindset, yet in evading division along racial lines, figures out how to effectively grasp all gatherings into a feeling of particular â€Å"nationalism†.Europe then again, battles to adjust 27 countries, each with their own feeling of patriotism, without giving noteworthy inclination to any one culture. A definitive effect of these strict and ethnic/nationalistic contrasts is that, truly, the US National Security Strategy peruses uniquely in contrast to the European Security Strategy. The change in foundation brings about various wording and position, various explanations behind why we do what we do, and the ideal outcome. This can cause misconstruing, and even doubt between these two incredible entities.However, it’s imperative to presume that by and large, we BOTH have a similar extr eme purpose: a proceeded with pledge to trans-atlantic relationship, globalized economy, diminished reliance on outside vitality, and, above all, harmony and security to our reality (Obama, 2010, 1-9) (European Security Strategy, 2003, 2-14). Taking everything into account, numerous world analysts (counting Samuel P Huntington in his guide of â€Å"The World of Civilizations†), while recognizing social classes on the planet, bunch the US, Canada, Greenland, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand as â€Å"the West† (Huntington, 1997, 26).Due to the accentuation on solid strict roots, faith in right, show fate, and ethnic decent variety in the United States, our expressed targets and self-distinguished job on the planet is one of a kind. Be that as it may, generally speaking, European †US procedure and culture are not all that strikingly unique. Book reference Branigin, William, â€Å"The Myth of the Melting Pot: America’s Racial and Ethnic Divides. Worke rs Shunning Idea of Assimilation† (Washington, DC: Washington Post, 25 May 1998), http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-srv/national/longterm/meltingpot/melt0525a. htmEuropean Security Strategy, A Secure Europe in a Better World, (Brussels, 12 December 2003), 2-14 Friedman, George, â€Å"The Crisis of Europe and European Nationalism† (Austin, TX: StratFor Global Intelligence, 13 September 2011), 1, http://www. stratfor. com/week after week/20110912-emergency europe-and-european-patriotism Huntington, Samuel P. , â€Å"The World of Civilizations† The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York, NY: Touchstone, 1997), 26-27 Obama, Barack, National Security Strategy (Washington, DC: Whitehouse Archives, 2010), 1-9Rosenberg, Matt, â€Å"European Union Countries† (About. com, 09 December 2011), 1, http://topography. about. com/od/records/an/eumembers. htm Rubenstein, Richard L. , â€Å"Islam and Christianity: The Roots of Europe’s Reli gious Identity† (New English Review, December 2011), 1, http://www. newenglishreview. organization/custpage. cfm/frm/102790/sec_id/102790 Valesek, Tomas, â€Å"Europe’s Defense and its New Security Strategy† (Center for European Reform Bulletin: London, England, Dec 2007-Jan 2008), 1, http://gees. organization/documentos/Documen-02705. pdf Walthrop, John, â€Å"Modell of Christian Charity† (Massachusetts, 1630), 1,